SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.S.KANG, V.K.AGRAWAL
Kabra Investment (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-II – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jitendra Singh,V.K. Verma

ORDER

Per V.K. Agrawal :

M/s. Kabra Investment (P) Ltd. have filed this appeal being aggrieved with the Order No. Commr(A)/48/AHD-II/2001 dated 10.7.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Appeals.

2. Shri Jitendra Singh, learned Advocate, submitted that the Appellants manufacture HDPE/PP sacks and avail Modvat Credit of the duty paid on the inputs; that in the month of June, 1994, they purchased PP/HDPE fabrics and availed of Modvat credit amounting to Rs. 2,80,280/-; that the fabrics in the running length of Rolls was cut into the required sizes in their factory; that on account of labour dispute which led to strike, they could not convert the said cut pieces into sacks; that they sold those cut pieces of HDPE/PP fabrics to other party on payment of concessional rate of duty, appellants being a small scale unit; that the Assistant Commissioner, under Adjudication Order No. 77/98 dated disallowed the Modvat Credit and directed them to reverse/pay the same and imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- holding that they had sent the goods to another party whose identity was not disclosed and the inputs had not been used for manufacturing process; that the Commissioner (Appeals), under the impugned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top