SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.K.USHA, C.N.B.NAIR, KRISHNA KUMAR
Fabworth (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Sridharan,Atul Dixit

ORDER

Per Justice K.K. Usha :

These appeals are at the instance of two assessees. M/s Fabworth (India) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Fabworth) are engaged in the manufacture of all-wool worsted fabrics, wool-silk fabrics and poly-wool fabrics in its 100% export-oriented units. The processed fabrics are exported. M/s Woolworth (India) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Woolworth) is also having 100% EOUs where various kinds of yarns are manufactured and exported. Under the EXIM Policy they are entitled to numerous concessions. They are permitted to sell 25% of their production in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) i.e., within India, with prior permission of the Development Commissioner, and subject to payment of duty of excise under the proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with any Exemption Notification issued under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act. These facts are not in dispute.

2. The issue that has come up for consideration in these appeals is whether the appellants are liable to pay 50% of the countervailing duty (CVD) equivalent to the duties coming under Additional Duty of Customs under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, additional duties of Ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top