SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 212

R. S. PATHAK, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Khandelwal Metal And Engineering Works – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GANGULY, A.K.GOHIL, A.K.SEN GUPTA, A.M.SHAH, A.S.PUNDIR, A.T.M.SAMPATH, ABHAY M.SHAH, Altaf Ahmed, Anil B.Divan, ARUNESHVAR GUPTA, ASHOK GUPTA, B.C.AGRAWAL, B.P.MAHESHVARI, B.PARTHASARTHY, BRIJ BHUSHAN SHARMA, C.S.VAIDYANATHAN, C.V.SUBBA RAO, D.D.SHARMA, D.K.AGRAWAL, D.K.CHHAYA, D.N.Mishra, D.P.MOHANTY, E.C.AGARWAL, G.D.RAVAL, GOBIND DAS, HALIDA KHATUN, HARISH N.SLAVE, HEMANTIKA VATII, J.N.AGARWAL, J.P.DEVADHAR, JANENDRA LAL, K.DILIP KUMAR, K.J.JOHN, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, K.SWAMY, KAILASH VASUDEV, Kamal Parsurampuria, L.R.GUPTA, M.A.Firoz, M.K.BANERJI, M.K.D.NAMBUDIRY, M.M.ABDUL KHADER, MADAN SHARMA, N.D.GARG, NISHA SRIVASTAV, O.C.MATHUR, P.D.SHARMA, P.H.Parekh, P.K.MUKHERJI, Pallavi S.Shroff, PRAKASH MITTAL, R.AGGARWALALA, R.C.PATHAK, R.D.UPADHYAY, R.N.BAJORIA, R.N.Poddar, R.S.Suri, R.SATISH, RAINU VALIA, RAJESH GUPTA, RANI CHHABRA, Ravindra Narayan, S.A.SHROFF, S.K.Bagga, S.K.DHOLAKIA, S.N.Parekh, S.P.MONGIA, S.S.SHROFF, S.SRINIVASA VARMA, SHOBHA DIXIT, Shyam Mudaliari, SOLI J.SORABJI, SUBHASH PAREK, SURAJ UDAI SINGH, SUSHIL JAIN, Talat Ansari, V.K.PANDITA, V.K.VARMA, V.MENON, V.N.DESHPANDE, VIJAY PANDIT

Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, CJI.:- This is a group of Civil Appeals and Special Leave Petitions arising out of a judgment dated October 19, 1982 delivered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in a batch of Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. Those Writ Petitions having been dismissed by the High Court, the Writ-petitioners have filed these Appeals and Special Leave Petitions.

2. The facts of the various writ petitions naturally vary from case to case but, such variation has no bearing on the points which arise for our decision. We will mention the, facts of Civil Appeals Nos. 27-33 of 1983 as a representative batch of cases. The. two appellants therein are respectively Messers Eastern Engineers, a partnership firm carrying on business at Goregaon, Bombay, and a partner of that firm. For the sake of convenience, we will proceed on the basis that the real appellant is the firm. The appellant carries on the business, inter alia, of importing brass scrap from other countries. Its contention is that the additional duty of customs, which is in the nature of countervailing duty, cannot be levied on brass scrap because, such scrap which consists of damaged brass a




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top