SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GOWRI SHANKAR, G.N.SRINIVASAN
Swem Industries – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Surat-I – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.C. Patel,R.K. Pardeshi

ORDER

Per Gowri Shankar :

These appeals are taken up for disposal, with the consent of both sides, after waiving deposits.

2. By the order impugned in these appeals, the Commissioner has demanded duty of Rs. 9.92 lakhs approx. from Swem Industries (appeal 284/01), imposed a penalty of equal amount under Section 114A of the Act, imposed a penalty of Rs. 1.00 lakh on Fahod Safi Motiwala, its partner, ordered confiscation of three tempo vans each owned by Salimbhai Gulam Hussain Shaikh, Jafar Mohd Usmangani Khoji and llyasbhai Shaikh, with an option to redeem it on payment of fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, and imposed penalties of Rs. 10,000/- each on them, and also on Dayaram Prajapati, who was present in the tempo owned by llyasbhai Shaikh.

3. The facts on the basis of which the Commissioner has come to his conclusion are these. The officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence intercepted two of the tempo vans on the highway near Surat, and found them to be loaded with polyester yarn of foreign origin. Investigation by them led them to Swem Industries where they found a third tempo van loaded with such yarn ready to leave. Their enquiries resulted in the conclusion that the yarn in qu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top