K.SREEDHARAN, LAJJA RAM, C.N.B.NAIR
Indian Spinners Association – Appellant
Versus
Designated Authority, Ministry of Commerce – Respondent
Per Justice K. Sreedharan :
Appellants seek to challenge the final findings of the learned Designated Authority, constituted under the provisions of Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Provisions in Customs Tariff Act, 1975, suggesting imposition of anti-dumping duties on Polyester Staple Fibre imported from Korea and Thailand. The finding arrived at by the Designated Authority was notified in the gazette dated 21st January, 2000. Thereafter, a corrigendum was published in the gazette dated 22nd February, 2000. Recommendations made by the Designated Authority in the above mentioned notification and corrigendum are under challenge.
2. On the basis of the determination made by the Designated Authority, it is common case that Central Government has not imposed any anti-dumping duty on the goods imported from Korea or Thailand.
3. In Saurashtra Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India reported in 2000 (118) ELT 305 (SC), Supreme Court considered the scope of the appeal to this Tribunal against the order of the Designated Authority. For a proper understanding of that decision, we read that judgment:-
"We see no reason whatsoever to entertain these special leave petitions. It is perfectly clear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.