SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.SREEDHARAN, LAJJA RAM, C.N.B.NAIR
Indian Spinners Association – Appellant
Versus
Designated Authority, Ministry of Commerce – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.B. Shroff, C. Hari Shankar,Maninder Singh

ORDER

Per Justice K. Sreedharan :

Appellants seek to challenge the final findings of the learned Designated Authority, constituted under the provisions of Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Provisions in Customs Tariff Act, 1975, suggesting imposition of anti-dumping duties on Polyester Staple Fibre imported from Korea and Thailand. The finding arrived at by the Designated Authority was notified in the gazette dated 21st January, 2000. Thereafter, a corrigendum was published in the gazette dated 22nd February, 2000. Recommendations made by the Designated Authority in the above mentioned notification and corrigendum are under challenge.

2. On the basis of the determination made by the Designated Authority, it is common case that Central Government has not imposed any anti-dumping duty on the goods imported from Korea or Thailand.

3. In Saurashtra Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India reported in 2000 (118) ELT 305 (SC), Supreme Court considered the scope of the appeal to this Tribunal against the order of the Designated Authority. For a proper understanding of that decision, we read that judgment:-

"We see no reason whatsoever to entertain these special leave petitions. It is perfectly clear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top