SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, G.R.SHARMA
HCL Hewlett Packard ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Meerut – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R. Madhav Rao,K. Srivastava

ORDER

Per Jyoti Balasundaram :

The sole issue for determination in this batch of appeals is whether the value of systems software, application software and peripherals are includible in the value of computer systems manufactured by the appellants herein.

2. We have heard both sides and carefully considered their submissions.

3. The authorities below have inter-alia relied upon the decisions of the Tribunal in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. Sunray Computers P. Ltd. reported in 1988 (33) ELT 787 and Tata Unisys Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay reported in 1994 (73) ELT 96, in coming to the conclusion that the value of computer systems would also include the value of systems software, application software and peripherals. However, we find that the Apex Court, in the case of PSI Data Systems Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise reported in 1997 (89) ELT 3 (SC) (on appeal against the Tribunal's order reported in 1994 (73) ELT 96 and two other orders) has set aside the Tribunal's order, holding that the value of software, if sold along with the computer, cannot be included in the assessable value of the computer for the purpose of excise duty. The Hon'ble

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top