SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.KHOSLA, V.K.SHRIDHAR
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. , In re – Appellant
Versus
– Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Percy Pardiwalla, Vivek Katara, Ms. Aarti Sathe, Rahul Mittal, Nitin Savara, Sandeep Gupta,Narender Kumar

RULING

V.K. Shridhar, Member. - The applicant in AAR No. 1006 of 2010 is Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, USA (GTRC), a company incorporated under the laws of Ohio, USA. The applicant in AAR No. 1031 of 2010 is Goodyear Orient Company (Private) Limited, Singapore (GOCPL), a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Singapore. The Goodyear India Limited (GIL) is a public company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. GTRC is the promoter of GIL and presently holds 17,069,215 equity shares representing 74 per cent of the total paid up capital of GIL. The remaining 26 per cent shareholding is presently held by public shareholders. GOCPL is a wholly owned subsidiary of GTRC.

2. The applicant, GTRC, submits that as part of its global corporate strategy, it is contemplating a reorganization of its investment in its Indian arm, GIL. It is seeking to expand the role of its Singapore based GOCPL for the benefit of its other group entities within Asia-Pacific Region by making it a financially strong and important entity of the group. GOCPL is an operating company and manages the natural rubber purchasing, delivery, financing, treasury a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top