SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.BHATTACHARYA, R.N.BHARDWAJ, KUMAR RAJARATNAM
Padmini Technologies – Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vinay Chauhan,V.N. Shingnapurkar

ORDER

Justice Kumar Rajaratnam, Presiding Officer. - Appeal is taken up with consent of parties.

2. The appellant, Padmini Technologies Ltd., challenges the order passed by the Adjudicating Officer wherein the Adjudicating Officer has imposed a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs for failure to redress the investor grievances within the time stipulated by the Board.

3. SEBI had issued a show-cause notice dated 19-8-2003 to the company alleging that the company had not redressed 321 complaints of the investors which was pending as on 22-4-2003, and asking them why an inquiry should not be held in terms of rule 4 of SEBI (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalty by Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995 and penalty imposed under section 15C of SEBI Act, 1992.

4. The appellant vide letter dated 23-9-2003 informed that more than 60 complaints were resolved. On verification by SEBI, it found that 73 complaints were resolved and 248 complaints were still pending out of 321 complaints. It was found that majority of the cases related to seeking transfer of share certificate, which does not incur financial outlay to the company unlike other complaints that relate to payment of dividend or interest on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top