SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.ROHINI
P. Utheja – Appellant
Versus
S. Srinivas – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Smt. D. Pramada, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Eranki Phani Kumar, Advocate.

ORDER

Ms. G. Rohini, J.— This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 19.7.2013 in I.A.No.269 of 2013 in FCOP No.248 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Family Judge, Secunderabad.

2. The revision petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent. She filed OPNo.248 of 2012 against the respondent seeking a decree for annulment of the marriage on the ground of non-consummation of marriage as well as a decree for divorce on the ground of cruelty.

3. The respondent herein filed I.A.No.269 of 2013 under Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC with a prayer to return OPNo.248 of 2012 for want of territorial jurisdiction. The said I.A. was allowed by the Court below by order dated 19.7.2013 and aggrieved by the same this revision petition is filed.

4. For the sake of convenience, the petitioner and the respondent shall hereinafter be referred to as ‘wife’ and ‘husband’ respectively.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties.

6. As could be seen from the material available on record, the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent is not in dispute. According to the revision petitioner/wife, the marriage was performed at Nama Kalyana Mandapam, Surya Conve



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top