Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.—The Counsel for the respondent No.1 caveator has appeared.

2. The caveat stands discharged. C.M. No. 8541-42/2014 (exemptions)

3. Allowed subject to just exceptions.

4. The applications are disposed of.

FAO (OS) No. 239/2014 and CM No. 8540/2014 (for stay).

5. The appeal impugns the order dated 2.5.2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court (exercising original civil jurisdiction in CS(OS) 2353/2013) of allowing the application being IA No. 4955/2014 of the respondent No. l/plaintiff and permitting to the respondent No.1/ plaintiff return of Rs. 6.24 crores deposited by the respondent No. l/plaintiff in this Court together with interest accrued thereon.

6. We have, with consent, heard the counsels finally at the stage of admission.

7. The respondent No. l/plaintiff instituted the suit from which this appeal arises, for a decree for specific performance of an agreement dated 1.2.2013 of sale by the appellants/defendants to the respondent No. 1/plaintiff of land situated within the revenue estate of village Bakhtawarpur. New Delhi, for a total sale consideration of Rs.9.24 crores out of which a sum of Rs. 3 crores was stated to have been paid.

8. The suit a