VIBHA KANKANWADI
Ratnamala – Appellant
Versus
Pandurang Udhav Zate – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.—Admit.
2. Though a separate Civil Application has been filed for the custody of the minors till the final hearing and disposal of the appeal; with consent of both the parties, since all the documents have been produced on record and especially when both the parties had not led oral evidence before the learned District Judge-1, Basmathnagar and matter was considered only on the point of submissions of both the parties by the Trial Court, the First Appeal itself is taken for final hearing at the admission stage.
3. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Y.B. Bolkar for the appellant and learned Advocate Mr. D.M. Shinde for the respondent.
4. It has been vehemently submitted on behalf of the appellant-mother that it is not in dispute that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent-husband was solemnized on 03.05.2013 as per the Hindu rites and they have two children – daughter Pranjal, aged 6 and son Prajwal, aged 2. Further, it is also not in dispute that the respondent-husband has filed Hindu Marriage Petition No.28/2020 for divorce. The appellant-applicant had filed Civil Miscellaneous Application No.8/2020 before learned District Judge-1, Basmathn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.