SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(SC) 109

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Surinder Kaur Sandhu – Appellant
Versus
Harbax Singh Sandhu – Respondent


Advocates:
C.M.NAYAR, Kailash Mehta, PURAN CHAND MEHTA, Vijay Jhanji

JUDGMENT

Chandrachud, CJI.- The appellant, Surinder Kaur Sandhu, is the wife of respondent 1, H1rbax Singh Sandhu. Respondent 2 is the father of respondent 1. Appellant and respondent 1 were married in 1975 at Bodni Kalan, District Faridkot, Punjab, according to Sikh rites. Soon after the marriage they left for England, where a boy named Pritpal Singh was born to them on October 24, 1976.

2. Within a short period after the birth of the boy, the relationship between the spouses came under a strain resulting in a serious spisode. The husband was trapped by the Barkshire Police who got the scent that he was negotiating with a hit man to have the wife run over by a car. The husband was convicted and sentenced to a term of three years for that offence. Ironically, it was the wife who intervened and succeeded in obtaining a probation order for the man who had attempted to procure her murder. The husband was released on probation on February 4, 1982. The period of probation expired on December 24, 1982.

3. On January 31, 1983, while the wife was away at work, the husband removed the boy from England and brought him to India. On the same date, the wife obtained an order under section













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top