JUDGMENT

Raj Beer Singh, J.—This Revision has been preferred against order dated 25.08.2020 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly in criminal case no. 305 of 2012 (Filing no. 09200318962012) (Smt. Akhtari Begam Vs. Irshad Ali), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Anwala, District Bareilly, whereby revisionist Irshad Ali has been directed to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs. 3,000/- per months from the date of application to the date of order and to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per month from the date of order to the opposite party no. 2 under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

2. Heard Sri S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for State. However, no one has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 2 despite service of notice.

3. It has been argued by learned counsel for revisionist that impugned order is against facts and law and beyond jurisdiction and the amount of maintenance awarded by the court below is arbitrary and excessive. It has been submitted that the version of opposite party no.2 that she is married wife of revisionist or that on 07.05.1980 her marriage/nikah has been solemnized with revisionist according to Mahommedan rites