SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Md. Hanif – Appellant
Versus
Md. Taufiq Alam – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:M/s. Jai Prakash Jha, Sr. Advocate, Aishwarya Prakash and Ashish Kumar Thakur, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.—The appellant is the plaintiff who has preferred the second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC against the judgment and decree of reversal passed by the Principal District Judge, Dumka in Title Appeal No.9/2012.

2. Plaintiff filed Suit in exercise of the peremptory right to purchase the suit property and for a decree directing the Defendant No.1 to execute sale deed of the schedule ‘B’ property in favour of the plaintiff and to give possession.

3. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that both the parties are Mohammedan by sect Sunni. The Plaintiff Md. Hanif and Defendant No.2 Bibi @ Buchun are full brother and sister. Defendant number 1 is a rank outsider having no relationship with the plaintiff and Defendant No.2. The plaintiff acquired the schedule A property by registered sale deed and is residing therein, and Defendant No.2 also acquired the suit property mentioned in schedule B, vide registered sale deed in the year 1983 towards the North of schedule A property in which she was residing. Rafique Alam purchased schedule C property towards south of schedule A property and thus Schedule A property is situated in the middle between schedule

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top