JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Shree Chandrashekhar & Ratnaker Bhengra, J.
Paramjit Singh Gandhok – Appellant
Versus
Reema Ahluwalia @ Gandhok – Respondent
First Appeal No. 138 of 2017
(Against the judgment and the decree, both dated 4th April 2017, passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi in Matrimonial Title Suit No. 132 of 2016)
Decided on 6.2.2022
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 13-B – Divorce by mutual consent – Plea of appellant that his wife inflicted various acts of cruelty on him and he is entitled for a decree of divorce was not accepted by trial Judge and divorce suit was dismissed, however, alternatively a decree for judicial separation of parties has been granted – Appellant is intending to file a joint petition for mutual divorce under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – First appeal dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to parties to file appropriate application under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. (Paras 2, 6, 7 and 8)
Result: Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT
Shree Chandrashekhar, J.—Against the judgment and decree, both dated 4th April 2017, passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi in Matrimonial Title Suit No. 132 of 2016, the husband has preferred this first appeal under section 19(3) of the Family Court’s Act, 1984.
2. In Matrimonial Title Suit No.132 of 2016, stand taken by the appellant that his wife inflicted various acts of cruelty on him and, therefore, he is entitled for a decree of divorce was not accepted by the learned trial Judge and divorce suit was dismissed, however, alternatively a decree for judicial separation of the parties has been granted.
3. In the present appeal, the respondent-wife has filed three interlocutory applications vide IA No. 5484 of 2020 for grant of permanent alimony under section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; IA No. 5485 of 2020 for grant of maintenance pendente lite under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and; IA No. 5486 of 2020 seeking custody of the child under section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
4. Mr. Pratyush Kumar, the learned counsel for the respondent, states that in all three interlocutory applications the respondent has made a categoric statement that there is irretrievable breakdown of marriage between the parties.
5. Today, Mr. Pratyush Kumar, the learned counsel for the respondent, makes statement on instructions that the respondent-wife is also willing to take divorce, to which the appellant is agreeable.
6. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, the learned counsel for the appellant, affirming the statement made on behalf of the respondent-wife, states that the appellant is intending to file a joint petition for mutual divorce under section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
7. In view of the aforesaid statement made by Mr. Pratyush Kumar, the learned counsel for the respondent-wife, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, the learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw this first appeal to enable the parties to move the Court concerned seeking divorce by mutual consent by filing appropriate application under section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
8. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the parties as aforesaid.
9. IA No. 5484 of 2020, IA No. 5485 of 2020 and IA No. 5486 of 2020 stand disposed of.
Appeal dismissed.
Divorce by mutual consent – Parties may file appropriate application under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
The court can grant waiver of the statutory period for divorce by mutual consent based on the parties' long separation and no possibility of reconciliation, and can accept settlement terms if they ar....
Unilateral withdrawal from a mutual consent divorce agreement can constitute cruelty, and prolonged separation may indicate an irretrievable breakdown of marriage, justifying the grant of divorce.
Judicial discretion to waive cooling-off period for divorce granted under specific circumstances after evaluating stability and separation of marriage.
An appeal against a consent decree under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is maintainable, and the court's involvement in decision making in the consent decree is crucial.
Permanent alimony under Section 25(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act requires an application to be filed; without it, the court lacks jurisdiction to consider the claim.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.