Back
P.NAVEEN RAO, G.RADHA RANI
Mohammed Mohamood – Appellant
Versus
Syed Anwar Mustafa – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. G. Radha Rani, J.—Heard Ms. B. Madhavi, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Aadesh Varma, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent.
2. From the facts on record and as noticed by the trial Court, to the extent relevant are as under:—
(i) According to the 1st respondent, while he was working outside the Country, his wife was living in Hyderabad. He was sending the money earned by him to his wife to invest the same in landed property. By the money provided by him she purchased house property bearing H.No.8-1-366/A/72, admeasuring 200 Sq yards consisting of ground + two upper floors situated in Janaki Nagar, Tolichowki, Hyderabad, but it was registered in her name. When the 1st respondent returned to India he came to know this fact.
3. Contending that his request to register the property in his name was not agreed by his wife and she tried to alienate the property, the 1st respondent instituted O.S.No.1476 of 1997 in the Court of I-Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. He prayed to grant decree of declaration that he was the owner of suit schedule property and also sought injunction restraining the defendant i.e., his wife from alienating or encumberi
(1) Jurisdiction of Civil Court—Questions relating to disputed claims of parties for title to immovable property can be decided only by competent civil courts—Objection as to exclusion of civil court....
The doctrine of lis pendens applies to subsequent purchasers; their rights are subordinate to those of the decree holder in a specific performance case.
(1) Lis Pendens – Section 52 of T.P. Act has no application where transfer in favour of subsequent purchaser is not after filing of suit but before filing of suit for specific performance.(2) Resista....
The doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act binds purchasers to the outcomes of ongoing litigation concerning the property, negating claims of bona fide purchase with....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and its explanation, which clarified that....
The Court emphasized the importance of summary determination of questions under Rule 101 of Order XXI of the C.P.C. and the applicability of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. It also clarif....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
