SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
Bommareddy Gautham Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER (COMMON)

A. Rajasheker Reddy, J.—Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they are being heard together and disposed of by way of this Common Order.

2. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners are one family members i.e., husband, wife and son, as such, related to each other. Assailing the action of the 4th respondent-Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Crime Investigation Department, Hyderabad in issuing letter dated 18.01.2021 to the Subregistrars of different areas in both the States i.e., State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh, directing them not to register the properties belonging to the petitioners, these writ petitions have been filed.

3. Since all these writ petitions are challenging the action of the 4th respondent-Inspector of Police, for the sake of convenience, the facts, in brief, in W.P.No.28643 of 2021 are taken into consideration, which are as follows:

The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of the properties mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, having purchased the same out of own funds and also out of loans obtained from financial institutions. The petitioner an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top