SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Usman Gani – Appellant
Versus
Mukand Singh – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. S.L. Jain and Mr. Abhinav Jain, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. G.R. Goyal, Advocate

ORDER

Devendra Kachhawaha, J.—The instant second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the appellants, who were defendants in the suit, against the judgment and order dated 04.02.2010 passed by the Additional District Judge, Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar in Civil Appeal No. 09/2005 titled as “Usman Ghani & Ors. Vs. Mukand Singh” by which, the appeal of the defendants-appellants has been dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Anoopgarh in Civil Suit No. 11/1999 titled as “Mukand Singh Vs. Usman Ghani & Ors.” by which, the learned Trial Court has decreed the suit for specific performance of the contract dated 14.08.1975 in favour of the plaintiff - Mukand Singh, has been affirmed.

2. During the pendency of the said appeal, the instant application under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed by the respondents on 25.09.2019 with the prayer that the application filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC may kindly be allowed and the whole appeal may kindly be abated in view of this fact that the appeal against appellant No.2 Yahiya Khan has already bee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top