SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.BADHARUDEEN
George – Appellant
Versus
Nidhin B. Parapattu – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:P. Thomas Geeverghese, Sri. Tony Thomas (Inchiparambil), Sri. E.S. Firos, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Is there any rigid rule that a Commissioner with assistance of Surveyor to measure the plaint schedule property shall not be appointed in any contingency, in a Suit for simple injunction ?

2. This Original Petition (Civil) has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.148/2018 pending before the Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor. He is aggrieved in the matter of dismissal of I.A.No.2268/2019 filed by the petitioner, who is the plaintiff in the above Suit, to appoint a Survey Commission to measure out the properties of the plaintiff as well as the defendants on the basis of the title deed to locate the same specifically.

3. As per order dated 29.06.2020, the learned Munsiff dismissed the application mainly on the ground that in a Suit for simple injunction, the question to be decided was whether the plaintiff had possession over the plaint schedule property and in such a Suit the commission report already filed along with rough sketch would be sufficient to decide the dispute between the parties.

4. Heard both sides in detail.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that though the Suit is one for simple in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top