SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SINDHU SHARMA
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lalita Karki – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Amarveer Manhas, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. R.K. Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pranav Jain, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Through the medium of this writ petition, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 06.04.2022, passed by the 3rd Additional Munsiff, Jammu (hereinafter referred to as “trial Court”) in a suit titled “Colonel Vijay Singh vs. Col. Dalbir Singh (deceased) through Legal Representatives Lalita Karki and Others’.

2. A suit for mandatory injunction was instituted by the petitioner against the defendant or any party claiming through him to handover vacant and peaceful possession of the house-Durga Niwas, situated at Amphala, Jammu in Survey No. 287 min, measuring 5 Kanals 11 Marlas along with the said land to the plaintiff and the same is pending before the trial Court. The litigation between the parties continued and the original defendant Lt. Col. Dalbir Singh died on 11.10.2006 without deposing before the trial Court in his defence, his legal representatives were brought on record on 15.11.2006. An application was filed by the respondents/defendants for permitting them to examine seven witnesses in place of the list of witnesses already submitted by the respondents and also the witnesses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top