ORDER

P.B. Suresh Kumar, J.—The first respondent in the writ appeal, who was the petitioner in the writ petition, seeks review of the judgment. Parties are referred to in this order for convenience, as they appear in the writ petition.

2. The petitioner is a member of the second respondent, a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (the Act). He was also the President of the Society for some time. The petitioner and others were surcharged by the first respondent, the Joint Registrar of Co-operative societies, under Section 68(2) of the Act in terms of Ext.P1 order on the ground that they have caused loss to the Society to the tune of Rs.3,15,269/- by taking out a building on lease unnecessarily, and without the permission of the competent authority under the Act. Earlier, based on an inquiry report of the Vigilance Officer appointed under Section 68A, an inquiry was ordered by the Joint Registrear under Section 68(1) through the second respondent, the concerned Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, and it is based on the report in the said inquiry that Ext.P1 order was passed.

3. The petitioner challenged Ext.P1 order mainly on the