SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI
Birendra Kumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Neetu Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Mr. Yatharth Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent: None

ORDER (ON BOARD)

This revision has been preferred against the order dated 24.09.2022 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur in Misc. Criminal Case No.311/2022 whereby applicant was directed to pay interim maintenance to the tune of Rs.5000/- to the respondent.

2. Shri Yatharth Singh would submit that respondent is the daughter of the applicant and she is 24 years old matured girl. He further submits that she is living separately from her parents without any rhyme or reason and the family members are willing to keep her with thems but she is not ready to stay with them. The applicant is working as driver and earning Rs.38,020/- per month. However, due to personal loan, Rs.14,366/- gets directly deducted from his salary. He would further submit that applicant’s wife is suffering from paralysis and including wife he has liability of 3 children in which one child is going to the college whereas other two are school going children. He would also submit that during lockdown period applicant’s daughter came under the influence of one person namely Animesh Sinha and since then without any consent of the parents she is living with him.

3. Counsel further submits that there is no ave

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top