SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANJAY DHAR, SANJAY DHAR
Kiran Bala – Appellant
Versus
Ashwani Kumar Singh Jasrotia – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ayush Pangotra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

The appellant has challenged order dated 10.02.2020 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Kathua, whereby his application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree dated 31.03.2018 passed by the same court, has been dismissed.

2. It appears that the respondent had filed a petition for dissolution of marriage under section 13 of the Jammu and Kashmir Hindu Marriage Act before the learned trial court. After summons were issued to respondent appellant herein, the same are stated to have been served upon her father on a couple of occasions who assured the Process Server that he will make the appellant/defendant to appear before the court on the date fixed. When the appellant did not appear before the court below on the date fixed, she was proceeded ex parte in terms of order dated 28.10.2017 passed by the learned trial court and the respondent herein was directed to lead evidence in ex parte.

3. The learned trial court after recording the ex parte evidence, passed ex parte judgment and decree dated 31.03.2018 whereby the petition of the respondent was accepted and ex parte decree of divorce under section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top