SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Shambhunath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jawahar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Nagendra Rai, Advocate

JUDGMENT (CAV)

This is an appeal preferred under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1925’) for setting aside the judgment dated 17th day of April, 1982 passed by learned District Judge, Saran, Chapra in Revocation Case No.10 of 1979 (Ram Sevak Singh Vs. Ghinawan Singh & Ors.). By the impugned judgment, the learned District Judge has been pleased to dismiss the suit arising out of an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 263 of the Act of 1925 and thereby refused to interfere with the order granting probate by the District Judge of Saran on 28.08.1928 in Probate Case No.110 of 1926 in favour of the father of defendant no.1.

2. In order to appreciate the dispute between the parties it would be relevant to state the genealogy of the parties as under:—

3. The facts of the case would reveal that wife of Ramroop Singh had pre-deceased him. Ramroop Singh died issueless. He is said to have executed a Will in favour of one of his nephews Sohitchand Singh in the year 1916 which was duly registered on 25.05.1916.

4. Sohitchand Singh filed a probate case in the court of learned District Judge, Chapra giving rise to Probate Case No.11

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top