SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. D. DHANUKA, M. M. SATHAYE
Uday Padmakar Sirsat – Appellant
Versus
Rupali Uday Sirsat @ Miss. Rupali Jayprakash Targe – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ashok Avhad, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Maheshwari Davi a/w. Ms. Gouri Govande, Advocate

JUDGMENT

M.M. Sathaye, J.—This Appeal is filed by Appellant/husband challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 07th June, 2021 passed by Family Court No. 7, Mumbai in Petition No. A-2223 of 2012 filed by Respondent/wife in the Family Court at Mumbai, thereby dissolving marriage between the parties u/s. 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and further directing the husband to return streedhan of wife, which is mortgaged with the DNS bank, Gangapur Road, Nasik, within specific time.

2. The Appellant/husband also filed Family Court Appeal No. 68 of 2021, challenging Judgment and Decree dated 07.06.2021 passed by Family Court No. 7 Mumbai dismissing his Petition No. A-3047 of 2016 for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It was heard by this Court on 13.07.2022, when a statement was made on behalf of the present Appellant that he does not want to seek restitution of conjugal rights and therefore, Family Court Appeal No. 68 of 2021 was dismissed.

3. The Appellant / Husband had filed I. A. No. 1878 of 2020 and I. A. No. 20330 of 2022, prayi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top