SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Harish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Usha Devi – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta and Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. R.K. Daga, Advocate

ORDER

Since, common question of law and facts are involved in these petitions, hence, with the consent of the counsel for the parties, both the matters are taken up and are being decided by this common order.

2. For the sake of convenience, the prayer mentioned in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13674/2022 is taken into consideration, the instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:—

“It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition and entire record of the learned trial court be called for and:—

(I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby quash and set aside the impguned order dated 28.05.2022 (Annexure-7) passed by learned trial Court in Civil Suit No.17/2009 titled as Prahlad Kumar Vs. Smt. Usha and Ors.

(II) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the applications dated 08.12.2021 filed by the petitioner for impleadment may kindly be allowed.

(III) Any other order or direction which the Hon’bl Court deems fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.

(IV) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top