VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Vijaybhai Martinbhai Christian – Appellant
Versus
Helinaben D/o Khodabhai Surabhai and W/o Wilsanbhai Thakor – Respondent
ORDER (ORAL)
Issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Ms. Mita S. Panchal, learned advocate waives service of Rule for and on behalf of the respondents / opponents.
2. Heard Mr. Mrugen K. Purohit, learned advocate for the applicants and Mr. Mihir Thakore, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. Mita S. Panchal, learned advocate appearing for the opponents herein - original plaintiffs.
3. By way of the present Civil Revision Application, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘the Code’), the applicants - original defendants have approached this Court, being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned order dated 03.12.2018 passed below application filed under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of ‘the Code’ below Exhibit-80, passed by the learned 3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), Mirzapur in Regular Civil Suit No.161 of 2008, whereby, the said application was rejected.
4. The brief facts leading to filing of the present Civil Revision Application read thus:
4.1. It is the case of the applicants that the land in question having Survey / Block No.73 of Mouje-Kamod & Survey / Block Nos.138, 401, 406 and 408 of Mouje - Bakrol, Taluka - Daskroi, District - Ahmedabad
Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanushali
Chhotnaben and Anr. vs. Kirtibhai Jalkrushnabhai Thakkar and Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the question of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact, requiring a trial on its own merits. The Court also clarified the maintainabil....
The court ruled that issues of limitation and contractual validity arising from disputed facts cannot be decisively adjudicated at the stage of rejecting a plaint, necessitating a trial based on evid....
The court dismissed the appeals on the ground that the suits were barred by the law of limitation under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, as the plaintiffs failed to file the suits within the prescri....
powers under Section 84-C of the Act will have to be exercised within reasonable time. The question then would arise what would be the reasonable time for exercise of such powers and what would be it....
(1) Rejection of plaint – When a document referred to in plaint, forms basis of plaint, it should be treated as a part of plaint – Court cannot look into written statement or documents filed by defen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.