CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.
Birendra Krishna Nag – Petitioner
versus
Sushmita Nag Chatterjee
and Anr. – Respondents
C.R.R. 4379 of 2022 with CRAN 1 of 2023
Decided on 20.3.2024
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – Section 12 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 468 – Maintainability of complaint – Intention of legislature is to protect those women who are living in a domestic relationship – Complaint can be filed by an aggrieved person or a Protection Officer or any other person on behalf of aggrieved person and there is no bar and other person on behalf of aggrieved person can file complaint – Domestic relationship has to be in present and not in the past – Once domestic relationship came to an end after decree of divorce complaint under DV Act could not have been filed – However, proceeding under Section 12 is maintainable even when domestic violence once committed, subsequent decree of divorce will not absolve liability of respondent from offence committed or to deny benefit to aggrieved person who is entitled under DV Act, 2005 provided application must be filed within one year or within limitation period as stipulated under Section 468 of Cr.P.C. – In present case, application under Section 12 of DV Act has been filed after expiry of a period of almost 4 years from date of a decree of divorce and after expiry of more than 11 years of domestic relationship – Proceeding under Section 12 quashed to secure end of justice. (Paras 6, 13, 15 and 16)
Result: Criminal Revision Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.—The petitioner being the husband of opposite party no. 1 has filed this application under Section 482 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the proceeding being A.C. 2391 of 2022 filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short ‘PWDV Act’) presently pending before the Court of Learned 5th Magistrate, Alipore and also praying for setting aside the orders passed therein in connection with the aforesaid proceeding.
2. The factual matrix of the instant case for filing this Criminal Revisional application is as under:
2a. The petitioner and opposite party no. 1 were the husband and wife and their marriage was held on 17.04.2009 according to the provision of Special Marriage Act, 1954. After marriage, they started residing at matrimonial home and one female child was born on 20th May, 2010. The disputes arose between the parties from the very inception of the marriage over trivial issues. The opposite party no. 1 alleged that the petitioner being a habitual drunkard used to abuse and insult the opposite party no. 1 and her family members and further denied basic necessities such as food as a result her health condition deteriorated.
2b. It is further alleged that she was forced to undergo abortion in spite of refusal by the opposite party no. 1. She was driven out on 08.02.2011 upon provocation by his mother with a single cloth along with her minor daughter. As she is unable to maintain herself and her minor daughter, she filed an application under Section 12 of PWDV Act on 24.08.2022 with a prayer for maintenance of Rs. 20,000/-for herself and Rs. 20,000/-for her minor daughter together with prayer for relief and protection under Sections 18, 19 and 22 of the PWDV Act, 2005. Upon receipt of the application, petitioner appeared before the learned Court below with a contention that the entire case is completely different and opposite party no.1/wife made the baseless allegations. She herself left her matrimonial home and started residing in her parental house with her minor daughter according to her own volition. Several efforts were made by the petitioner to resolve the disputes but opposite party no. 1/wife was so adamant and refused to reside under the same roof with her parents-in-law and demanded a separate residence. Petitioner herein further failed to convince her due to her arrogant behaviour.
2c. Having no other alternative, petitioner had instituted a suit for divorce as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and same was registered as MAT Suit No. 560 of 2017 before the Learned District Judge, Paschim Medinipur and subsequently transferred before the Learned 7th Judge, Paschim Medinipur for its disposal. Even after notice to the opposite party no. 1, she refused to appear and contested the MAT Suit before the Learned 7th Judge, Paschim Medinipur. As a result, the learned Judge allowed the said MAT Suit and finally awarded decree of divorce in favour of the petitioner ex parte by an order dated 11.12.2018 but surprisingly the opposite party no. 1, even after passing such ex parte order almost 4 years thereafter, filed the application under the PWDV Act claiming financial assistance as maintenance for her as well as for her minor daughter though she did not contact the petitioner since long and refuse to come back to lead conjugal life. Petitioner denied all baseless allegations made by her and stated about the fact that the decree of divorce had already been granted by the learned 7th Judge, Paschim Medinipur. Upon receiving of the letter of the petitioner, the opposite party no. 1, with an oblique motive of wreaking vengeance upon the petitioner, made an allegation against the petitioner though she filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 for setting aside the ex parte decree order dated 11.12.2018 and the same is pending for disposal before the learned Judge. The application file
Amit Agarwal and Ors. vs. Sanjay Aggarwal and Ors.
Maintainability of complaint – Domestic relationship has to be in present and not in the past.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a complaint under the PWDV Act may not be maintainable after a prolonged period of living separately and after the decree of divorce, as it co....
Divorced wives can invoke provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for claims regarding previous marriage responsibilities.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a subsisting domestic relationship between the respondent and the complainant for the court to pass an order under the DV Act....
Section 28 of Act provides for following procedure to be followed by a Magistrate while dealing with application for reliefs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to relief under the PWDV Act based on the finding of a domestic relationship, and the permissibility of adjustment of maintenance a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.