SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Amitabha Saha – Appellant
Versus
Sriparna Biswas – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Debasish Roy, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Hasnuhana Chakraborty and Ms. Vinay Kumar Purohit, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.—This application has been directed against order dated February 16, 2019 passed by the learned District Delegate at Alipore in Letters of Administration case no. 336 of 1984. One Anilananda Saha was the owner of the flat situated at the 2nd floor of premises no. 176 Rasbihari Avenue. Said Anilananda by the last will and testament bequeathed all his share in the said flat to his sister-in-law MRs.Sukumari Saha and her son Paramananda Saha with a stipulation that in case said Paramananda does not marry and dies without issue, the property will revert back to the present petitioneRs.The testator Anilananda died on 25th July 1983 and consequent to the death of the testator, aforesaid Paramananda and Sukumari applied for Letters of Administration of the said will and testament being Act XXXIX Case No. 336 of 1984 (L.A.) During pendency of the said proceeding, aforesaid Sukumari Saha expired on 09/07/1987. By order no.101 dated 11/09/2008, learned District Delegate was pleased to grant Letters of Administration in favour of the said petitioner Paramananda Saha @ Kanu Saha upon filing the court fee Rs.10,000/-. Thereafter Paramananda filed administrative

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top