GUJARAT HIGH COURT
J.C. Doshi, J.
Kumpal Jagdishbhai Madrasi – Applicant
versus
State of Gujarat and Anr. – Respondent
R/Criminal Revision Application
(For Maintenance) No.1605 of 2023
Decided on 26.3.2024
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – -Sections 125 and 397 – Award of monthly maintenance to wife – Petitioner against whom multiple orders are passed by Jurisdictional Courts has failed to pay single penny to destitute wife and now wants to take back wife so that maintenance order cannot sustain in view of Section 125(4) of Cr.P.C. – He is trying to saddle away to pay maintenance – Even if wife is capable of earning, it would not deny her to get maintenance from husband and live as per status of husband – Impugned order is well reasoned order – Wife who is destitute is burdened with expenses of litigation – Revision Application dismissed with costs of Rs.15,000/-, to be paid by petitioner-husband to respondent-wife. (Paras 11, 12, 14 and 15)
Result: Revision Application dismissed with costs.
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
Present Revision Application is filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. to quash and set aside the order dated 16.02.2023 passed by the learned Family Court, Surat below Exh.85 in Criminal Misc. Application No.1182 of 2017, whereby, the learned Family Court, Surat has directed the petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs.12,000/- per month from 27.09.2017 to December, 2019, Rs.14,000/- per month from January, 2020 to December 2022 and further to pay maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per month from January, 2023 regularly to the respondent - wife.
2. Facts of the case are as under:—
2.1. On 13.05.2017, the petitioner got married with respondent - wife. It is further alleged that after marriage, mother and aunt of the petitioner created disturbance between the petitioner and respondent wife and they used to torture her. As per case of respondent - wife, on 15.06.2017 the petitioner without informing her departed to USA. Upon inquiry, her mother in law, started abusing respondent - wife. It is alleged that on 22.07.2017, mother in law of the respondent wife after collecting all jewellery, marriage certificate, cash etc. from respondent wife, locked their house and left for USA. Thereafter, the petitioner demanded for divorce from respondent wife. It is alleged that respondent wife was deserted by petitioner and his family without her fault. It is stated that petitioner is having job at USA and his salary is at Rs.8,00,000/- with house ownership in USA and therefore, she is entitled to maintenance of Rs.2.5 lach per month. Learned Family Court, Surat after hearing the parties passed impugned order dated 16.02.2023. Hence, present Revision Application.
3. Principle contention of learned advocate for the petitioner - husband is that husband without any condition is ready and willing to take back wife. It is submitted that in view of section 125(4) and section 125(5) of Cr.P.C., wife is not entitled to get any maintenance amount. It is submitted that there is no consumption of marriage. It is submitted wife barely lived with the husband and started demanding huge amount as to clear loan of her father. It is submitted that wife is practicing Doctor having degree of BHMS and she is earning and therefore, wife is not entitled to get maintenance from husband. It is submitted that learned Trial Court has committed error in granting maintenance under section 125 of Cr.P.C. It is submitted that wife is not giving back passport to obtain VISA for herself to facilitate husband to take back to USA. The submissions are made to allow present Revision Application.
4. Learned advocate Mr.Barot for the respondent - husband would submit that Rs.10,26,000/- is outstanding towards maintenance amount granted by the learned Trial Court through impugned order. This is first part. In another part, learned JMFC, Surat in its detail order under Domestic Violence Act also ordered to grant monthly maintenance of Rs.1,00,000/- from the date of petition i.e. 29.09.2017. Apart from it, Rs.50,000/- per month was ordered to be paid towards rent of the premises and Rs.11 lakhs was ordered to be paid towards compensation under section 22 of the Domestic Violence Act. The petitioner - husband has not paid any penny towards either of the order. The petitioner is running from paying maintenance amount ordered by the Courts. Therefore, it is submitted that no discretion should be exercised in favour of the petitioner and submitted to dismiss Revision Application with costs.
5. Learned APP for the respondent - State submitted to pass necessary ordeRs.
6. At the outset, I may refer to section 397 of Cr.P.C., which reads as under:—
“397. Calling for records to exercise powers of revision.—(1)The High Court or any Sessions Judge may call for and examine the record of any proceeding before any inferior Criminal Court situate within its or his local jurisdiction for the purpose of satisfying itself or himself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the wife to maintenance under section 125 of Cr.P.C. based on her inability to maintain herself and the husband's financial c....
Grant of maintenance to wife and minor daughter – Mere capacity of wife to earn something or her qualification would not be reason for denying maintenance to wife.
Grant of maintenance to wife and minor daughter – Mere capacity of wife to earn something or her qualification would not be reason for denying maintenance to wife.
Maintenance – A well qualified spouses should not be left idle or to remain idle basing on their maintenance amount received from their husband.
The court upheld the order for maintenance based on the husband's income and the wife's inability to maintain herself under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the husband's liability to pay maintenance if the wife is unable to maintain herself and if the husband has sufficient means, as per Section 125....
The court emphasized that maintenance must reflect the financial status of both parties, ensuring the wife maintains a standard of living consistent with her marriage while considering her earning ca....
three children are under the custody of their mother/ petitioner. Since the petitioner is a guardian of their children she has to maintain the education and marriage of the children etc. Further, the....
Maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C should be awarded from the date of the application, and evidence is essential to substantiate income claims.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.