Shikha VS Avaneesh Mahodaya

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Shikha – Appellant
Versus
Avaneesh Mahodaya – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners: Shri Syed Asif Ali Warsi, learned counsel
For the Respondents: Shri Rajat Raghuwanshi, learned counsel

ORDER

Both the Criminal Revisions are arising out of the same order and hence both the revisions are being heard and decided with this common order analogously.

2. These criminal revisions have been preferred under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, r/w S. 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. by the the Husband and Wife respectively being aggrieved by the order dated 15.05.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore in M.Cr.C No.295/2015 whereby learned Principal Judge allowed the application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. filed by the wife by directing the husband to pay interim maintenance of Rs.60,000/- to the wife, per month.

3. Brief facts of the case are that, the wife has filed an application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. before the Family Court, Indore seeking maintenance from the husband. As per her application, she got married with her husband by Hindu rights and rituals on 27.11.2023. She stayed with her husband and her in-laws at Pune, Abu-Dhabi and Dubai, wherein she was performing her duty as an ideal wife and always taken care of her husband and his family members. It has been alleged in the application that the husband has not taken care of her and us