Anjlli Patil alias Anjlii Gaurav Sharma VS Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

MILIND N. JADHAV
Anjlli Patil alias Anjlii Gaurav Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni a/w Mr. Ravindra Parihar and Ms. Trupti Sawant, Advocates
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Abhishek Chitnis a/w Ms. Niyati Shah, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. Kulkarni, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mr. Chitnis, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 1.

2. Present Writ Petition takes exception to the order dated 12.02.2024 passed by the learned Trial Court below unnumbered Exhibit dated 31.01.2024 which is an Application moved by Defendant No.1 (Respondent No.1 herein). The Application was moved for rejection of Suit Plaint under O VII R 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “CPC”). After hearing both sides, learned Trial Court in its wisdom partly allowed the Application, inter alia, directing Plaintiff (Petitioner herein) to properly value the Suit Plaint and pay requisite court fee stamp since that was the only sustainable objection raised by Defendant No. 1 in its Application.

3. Briefly stated Plaintiff is the wife of an Army Officer. She filed Special Civil Suit No. 2401/2023 seeking declaratory relief, damages, her reinstatement and injunction pursuant to her termination. She was serving with Defendant No. 1 Company as ‘Vice President’ and was terminated against which she approached the Civil Court. In the Valuation Clause as stated in the Suit Plaint, she categorically pleaded that being the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

MILIND N. JADHAVAnjlli Patil alias Anjlii Gaurav Sharma – AppellantVersusBajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

Related Judgments