SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Omprakash Sunda – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhola Ram Chahar
For the Respondent: Mr. Ashok Kumar for Mr. Vikas Godara

ORDER

This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 23.07.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deedwana whereby the learned Judge dismissed the appeal of the petitioner and affirmed the judgment dated 09.06.2022 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deedwana whereby the petitioner was convicted for offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act and sentenced to undergo one year simple imprisonment along with fine in the sum of Rs.6,90,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo three months SI.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the revision petition, the petitioner and complainant/respondent have entered into a compromise in the spirit of Lok Adalat and the respondent has received all the amount from the petitioner and does not want to proceed in the matter. It is stated that since the parties have entered into compromise and amicably settled their dispute, therefore, the sentence of imprisonment awarded to the petitioner may be set aside. A copy of compromise is already available on record.

3. Counsel for the respondent concurs the fact of compromise arrived at betwee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top