SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
J. Ramchander – Appellant
Versus
Janabai – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Chakravarthy PVSK, Advocate
For the Respondent:S.M. Deshmukh, Smt. Tirumala Devi Eada, Advocates

JUDGMENT

This is an appeal filed by the appellants, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 06.09.2019 passed in O.S.No.282 of 2010 by the learned I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short “the trial Court”).

2. The appellants herein are the defendants and the respondents are the plaintiffs before the trial Court. The parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed in the suit before the trial Court for the sake of convenience and clarity.

3. The case of the plaintiffs before the trial Court is that the plaintiff No.1 is the wife of deceased J.Ramulu and plaintiff No.2 is his daughter. Defendant No.1 is the younger brother of Ramulu and defendant No.2 is son of defendant No.1. It is their case that during his life time Ramulu purchased an open plot from Padmashali Housing Cooperative Housing Society through a registered sale deed during 1979 and thereafter, he constructed ground and first floor and the house number was allotted as No.1-3-1/A/42. Ramulu and plaintiffs were residing in the suit schedule property and defendant No.1 who is the younger brother of Ramulu used to stay with them since his childhood as their father passed away when Ramulu wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top