Priyanka Nayak Pradhan VS Pranaya Pradhan Nayak

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

B. P. ROUTRAY, CHITTARANJAN DASH
Priyanka Nayak Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
Pranaya Pradhan Nayak – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. M.B. Das, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. H. Mohapatra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

B.P. Routray, J.—Heard Mr. M.B. Das, learned counsel for the Appellant-Wife and Mr. H. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the Respondent-Husband.

2. Present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 10.07.2023 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Puri in C.P. No.123 of 2019, wherein the decree of divorce has been granted at the behest of the Husband dissolving the marriage between the parties without any grant of permanent alimony.

3. The Wife-Appellant has come up in challenging the said judgment dated 10.07.2023 and according to her submissions, the ground of cruelty, based on which, the learned Family Court has granted decree of divorce is not established on record. It is further submitted on behalf of the Wife-Appellant that, it was the Husband, who compelled the Wife to leave the matrimonial companion and till date the Wife is staying separately in her parent’s house since 25.03.2018.

4. The admitted facts of the case are that, marriage between the parties solemnized on 1.6.2016 according to Hindu rites and customs. It is alleged on the part of the Husband that, the Wife was always passing comments towards physical infirmity of the Husband, for which unplea