SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. SAKTHIVEL
Sebastian – Appellant
Versus
Kattari @ Selvaraj – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. M. Thamizhavel, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. K. Mahalingam, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Feeling aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated January 3, 2017 passed in O.S. No.11 of 2014 by ‘the Principal District Court, Thiruvarur’ [‘Trial Court’ for brevity], the defendant therein has filed this Appeal Suit under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of ‘the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908’ [‘CPC’ for short].

2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the Original Suit.

Plaintiff’s Case

3. The Suit Properties belong to the defendant. He had purchased the Suit Properties on different dates from different owners through Registered Sale Deeds in Documents Nos.342 of 2007, 345 of 2007, 430 of 2007, 547 of 2007 and 3461 of 2007. The defendant offered to sell the Suit Properties to the plaintiff. On December 20, 2010, the sale price was fixed as Rs.13,00,000/-(Rupees Thirteen Lakhs only) and on the same day the defendant had received Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lacs only) from the plaintiff as advance and executed an un-registered Sale Agreement. As per the terms of Sale Agreement, the plaintiff has to pay Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) on or before April 30, 2011 to the defendant and further, the plainti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top