CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Sugato Majumdar, J.
Kamal Kr. Mitra and Ors. – Plaintiffs
versus
Kum Kum Biswas and Ors. – Defendants
TS/1/2007 IA No: GA/8/2014 (Old No: GA/1514/2014), GA/9/2014 (Old No: GA/2312/2014) In the Goods of: Gour Lal Mitra, (D) With CS/90/2008 IA No: GA/10/2015 (Old No: GA/2234/2015)
Decided on 24.2.2026
Indian Succession Act, 1925 – Sections 63 and 276 – Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 68 – Probate of Will – When allegations are made by Caveators or Caveatrix that Testator was forced to execute Will or that coercion or undue influence had been exercised on Testator or that a particular will was a product of misrepresentation, burden of proof lies on them to prove that – Mere producing one attesting witness to establish due execution of will is not enough specially when statements of one of attesting witness were contradictory and not trustworthy – Apart from creating suspicious circumstances surrounding execution of Will, due execution of Will on a specific date is doubtful – Due execution of Will, in accordance with Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 is not established – Plaintiff is not entitled to grand of probate – Probate refused. (Paras 9 and 10.8)
Result: Probate Application dismissed.
JUDGMENT
Sugato Majumdar, J.—This is a contentious probate proceeding.
2. Deceased Gour Lal Mitra who was the Testator in the instant suit, was a Hindu and last resided at premises no. 5/1A, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata-700003. The said Gour Lal Mitra breathed his last on the 3rd day of June, 2005 in his residence. Prior to death, the Testator executed a will, said to be the last will and testament, dated 28th February, 2001 which was registered in Book No. III, Volume No. 3, Pages 292 to 302, Being No. 153 for the year 2001 at the office of the Registrar of Assurances, Kolkata. The Petitioner was appointed as the Executor.
3. On death of the Testator, the present application was filed by the Petitioner, praying for grant of probate of the said last will and testament dated 28/02/2001.
4. Citations were issued, following which several caveats were lodged, supported by respective affidavits in support of caveats. The Caveators and the Caveatrixes are one of the sons of the Testator and his daughters are the Caveatrixes. The present Petitioner is one of the sons of the Testator, the other being the Caveator.
5. Caveats were allowed and the affidavits in support of caveats were treated as written statement. The suit was renumbered and the Caveators as well as Caveatrixes became the Defendants.
6. The contention of the written statement filed by the original Defendant No. 1, Shyamal Kumar Mitra may be summarized as follow:—
a) The Testator, Gour Lal Mitra, at the time of his death, had only transferrable interests in respect of the premises no. 9, Nobin Chandra Boral Lane, Kolkata-700012.
b) Adhar Kumar Mitra, since deceased, father of late Gour Lal Mitra was the absolute owner and was in possession of the following properties at the time of his death:—
(i) 5/1A, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata – 700003.
(ii) 5/2A, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata – 700003.
(iii) 5/2B, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata – 700003.
(iv) 5/2C, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata – 700003.
(v) 5/2D, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata – 700003.
(vi) 5/2E, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata – 700003.
(vii) 5/2F, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata – 700003.
(viii) 6/1, Raja Rajballav Street, Kolkata – 700003.
(ix) 11C, Gokul Mitra Lane, Kolkata – 700005.
(x) 15, Gokul Mitra Lane, Kolkata – 700005.
(xi) 17, Gokul Mitra Lane, Kolkata – 700005.
(xii) 11A, Raja Dinendra Street, Kolkata – 700009.
(xiii) 11D, Gokul Mitra Lane, Kolkata – 700005.
(xiv) 11B, Raja Dinendra Street, Kolkata – 700009.
c) Adhar Kumar Mitra, prior to his death, executed one of will on 21/04/1944 which had been registered on 28/04/1944 in the office of the Registrar of Calcutta. In terms of the will, the said Adhar Kumar Mitra, since deceased, bestowed life interests on his two sons, namely, Gour Lal Mitra and Netai Lal Mitra, Prativa Bala Mitra being widow of one pre-deceased son Bhupendra Lal Mitra and two daughters, namely, Sushama Bose and Rajlaxmi Dutta.
The said Adhar Kumar Mitra appointed his two surviving sons as the managers of his estate; it was provided that the daughter-in law would get Rs.25/- per month from the estate of Adhar Kumar Mitra. The will further provided that, apart from payment of maintenance to the two daughters and widow daughter-in-law, the granddaughter shall be entitled to Rs.10/- per month till marriage. It was further provided in the will that on death of the two sons of Adhar Kumar Mitra, the estate would absolutely vest on the sons and daughters of Gour Lal Mitra and Nitai Lal Mitra whereby and whereunder the said sons and daughters would be the absolute owner of the estate in equal shares. Thus, it is pleaded in the written statement that Adhar Kumar Mitra specifically mentioned in his will that his sons Gour Lal Mitra and Nitai Lal Mitra would not be able to dispose of by way of mortgage, transfer or gift of any of the immovable properties and anything done contrary to this stipulation should be treated as void.
d) The said Adhar Kumar
H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma
Krishna Kumar Birla v. Rajendra Singh Lodha and Ors.
Daulat Ram and Ors. v. Sodha and Ors.
Ramabai Padmakar Patil v. Rukminibai Vishnu Vekhande and Ors.
Savithri and Ors. v. Karthyayani Amma and Ors.
Probate of Will – Where due execution of Will is not established, Probate can be refused.
A will is valid if duly executed, even without attesting witnesses, provided other credible evidence supports its authenticity, with the burden on challengers to prove undue influence or coercion.
The propounder of a Will must prove its valid execution and genuine nature, failing which, the Will cannot be upheld.
The propounder of a Will must satisfactorily prove its execution, whereupon the burden of proving any allegations of fraud or coercion shifts to the objectors. Minor gaps in testimony do not undermin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.