JUDGMENT :

1. These four revisions arise between the same parties out of the same suit and so they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Petitioner in all these Revisions is the plaintiff in the above suit.

3. He filed the said suit against the respondents 1 and 2 in the Revisions for partition of the plaint schedule properties and for separate possession of ?rd share in the suit schedule property.

4. He filed I.A. No.162 of 2019 under Order 7, Rule 14(3) CPC to receive certain documents; I.A. No.131 of 2019 to implead five persons as defendants 3 to 7 in the suit; I.A. No.132 of 2019 to reopen the suit; and I.A. No.133 of 2019 to recall P.W-1 for the purpose of marking the documents which are mentioned in I.A. No.162 of 2019.

5. The Court below by separate orders dismissed all the applications and challenging the same, these Revisions are filed.

CRP Nos.1359 of 2019, 1353 of 2019 and 1376 of 2019

6. It is the contention of the petitioner in all these Revisions that he had filed earlier I.A. No.332 of 2017 under Order 7, Rule 14(3) CPC to receive documents, but the trial Court dismissed it on 24.11.2017; that he then challenged the said order by way of Revision in CRP No.144 of 2