T.AMARNATH GOUD
D. Geetha – Appellant
Versus
P. Jaipal Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Appellants in former appeal (MACMA No.1232 of 2012) laid a claim petition in O.S.No.1657 of 2006 on the file of the V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge (Mahila Court) - cum - XIX Addl. Chief Judge, City Criminal Courts at Hyderabad, under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘Act’) seeking a compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) for the death of D. Krishna, who is father of appellant Nos.1 to 3 and son-in-law of appellant No.4, while the very same appellants being appellants in latter appeal (MACMA No.3545 of 2012) filed separate claim petition in O.P. No.1658of 2006 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - cum - XII Additional Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, under Section 166 of the Act, seeking a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) for death of D. Malleshwari, who is mother of appellant Nos.1 to 3 and daughter of appellant No.4.
2. Since parties, date of accident and crime vehicle in both the appeals are one and the same except the orders that were passed by different Tribunal, both these appeals are being disposed of by way of a common judgment.
3. Aggrieved by the order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.