JUDGMENT :

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.

1. Heard Sri V. Hariharan, learned Counsel for the appellants, Sri M.V.S. Sridhar, learned Counsel for respondents 1 and 4, Sri A. Narasimha Rao, learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent and Sri P. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Mrs. Rachana S. Waddepalli, learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.

2. The issues raised in both the appeals are interconnected, the respondents are one and the same and the appellant in CMA No. 188 of 2020 is the father of the appellant in CMA No. 189 of 2020. Also the evidence adduced in the Trial Court is almost identical. Therefore these CMAs are being disposed off by this common order.

The background facts

3. The 1st respondent is a Private Limited Company. Respondents 2 to 4 are its Directors. The 4th respondent is the daughter of the 3rd respondent and respondents 2 to 4 are related to each other.

4. The 1st respondent Company is engaged in real estate business.

5. The appellants filed the said suits on 10.5.2018 before the Civil Vacation Judge, Mahboobnagar during the summer vacation of May, 2018 for specific performance of agreements for sale dated 21.11.2016 and alternatively for damages of Rs. 30,00,000