SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 101

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
B. Vijaya Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sreedhar Pulipati – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : C.M.R. Velu.
For the Respondents: S.N. Veerender Singh.

ORDER :

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.

1. This Revision is filed challenging the order dated 21.08.2020 in I.A. No. 861 of 2019 in O.S No. 569 of 2019 passed by the I-Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Secunderabad.

2. The petitioner herein is a third party to the suit. The respondents No. 1 and 2 had filed the said suit against the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) - 3rd respondent, for permanent injunction restraining the latter from visiting or interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property.

3. It is the contention of the respondents No. 1 and 2 that they had started construction in December 2016, after obtaining a sanctioned plan on 10.11.2016 from the 3rd respondent and an occupancy certificate was also issued to them on 17.08.2019. It is contended that when the respondents No. 1 and 2 were making interior work and designing in the suit schedule property without any interference, the officials of the GHMC visited the site and stopped the work and are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the respondents No. 1 and 2 over the suit schedule property.

4. The petitioner herein filed I.A. No. 861 of 2019 under O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top