SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 132

P.NAVEEN RAO
D. Venkateswara Reddy S/o D. Guru Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Rajagopallavan Tayi.

ORDER :

1. Prayer sought in the writ petition reads as under:

    “.......to issue an appropriate writ or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No. 2 and 3 in listing the schedule property i.e. entire land to an extent of Ac. 15.18 gts. situated in Sy. No. 150 of Narsingi Village, R.R. District in prohibitory list or as Court dispute in Dharani Portal pursuant to the representation dated 04.05.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 forthwith list the property i.e. entire land to an extent of Ac. 15.18 gts. situated in Sy. No. 150 of Narsingi Village, R.R. District in prohibitory list and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. Heard Sri. Rajagopallavan Tayi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

3. According to petitioner, Acs. 15.18 guntas in Survey No. 150 of Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, was jointly purchased by way of registered sale deeds dated 23.03.2013, 30.01.2013, 18.04.2013, 08.04.2013 and 08

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top