Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, here are the key legal points:

1. The authority considering an application for a building permit should only verify if the applicant has a 'prima facie' title and lawful possession of the property, based on available documentation. They are not authorized to conduct a detailed or roving enquiry into the title or ownership disputes (!) (!) .

2. 'Prima facie' title is established when the applicant submits sufficient material, such as sale deeds and related documents, that on a straightforward review indicates ownership and possession over the property. The authority's role is limited to a preliminary assessment and does not include resolving complex ownership disputes (!) (!) .

3. The authority cannot reject a building permission solely based on pending civil suits or disputes regarding ownership, provided there is prima facie evidence of ownership and possession (!) .

4. The authority is not empowered to order a re-survey or to delve into detailed factual disputes concerning the boundaries or ownership, especially when such disputes are pending before a civil court (!) .

5. The decision to grant building permission must be based on the applicant's prima facie ownership and possession, and not on third-party objections or ongoing litigation, which should be resolved through civil courts (!) (!) .

6. The authority's role is limited to a preliminary assessment; it cannot adjudicate or decide on the substantive ownership or title of the property. Such disputes are to be resolved by competent civil courts (!) (!) .

7. The legal framework emphasizes that the existence of a civil suit or dispute does not automatically bar the issuance of building permission if the applicant demonstrates a prima facie case of ownership (!) .

8. Any action to revoke or deny building permission based on disputes of title or pending lawsuits without a detailed adjudication by a civil court is not sustainable and violates principles of law regarding administrative discretion (!) .

9. The authorities must ensure that their actions are confined to verifying prima facie ownership and possession, and avoid engaging in detailed fact-finding or adjudication of ownership rights, which are reserved for courts (!) (!) .

10. The legal position underscores that an applicant's possession and documentation linking them to the property are sufficient to justify granting permission, even if there are ongoing disputes or suits, unless a clear and final adjudication of ownership is made by a court (!) (!) .

Would you like a summary or specific legal advice based on these points?