IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Mr. Mohammed Bin Ziyad, a minor, rep. By his mother Smt. Noor - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Telangana & another - Respondents
Writ Petition No.12422 of 2021
Decided on : 21-06-2021
Indian Penal Code,1860 – Section 354 - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Section – 12 - POCSO Act – Section 8 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 438 - Offence of Assault or criminal force - Charged - Arrest - Petitioner are that, at around 8.15 p.m., when de facto complainant went out to purchase grocery, he entered into her house, started touching private parts of her daughter and torn her kurti - Daughter of de facto complainant pushed petitioner away in order to save herself, he beat her with fist blows - However, her daughter escaped from petitioner and informed her over phone - When de facto complainant came from the market, petitioner along with his friends was standing outside her house and when she objected, he also started beating her with fist blows on her neck, head, chest and stomach and touched her inappropriately - Then, she cried for help, on which he threatened her with dire consequences - Whether a juvenile can seek anticipatory bail, that too by way of writ petition? – Held, on consideration of principle laid down by it earlier and also other High Courts held that anticipatory bail in respect of a juvenile is not maintainable and juvenile has to avail remedy under Section - 12 of JJ Act, 2015 - It was also categorically held that for grant of anticipatory bail by a juvenile cannot be entertained by High Court or Court of Session by applying provision contained under Section - 6(2) of Act, and the powers conferred on Board can be used by High Court and Court of Session only when proceedings come before them in appeal, revision or otherwise except - Court disagree with principle laid down by Punjab and Haryana High Court in Kishan Kumar and also the Gujarat High Court in Kureshi Irfan Hasambhai – Court respectfully agree with the principle laid down by Division Bench of Madras High Court - Court, filing of an anticipatory bail application by a juvenile under Section - 438 of Cr.P.C. in a writ petition is not maintainable, and that juvenile has to avail remedy under Section - 12 of JJ Act, 2015 - Writ Petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondents in not releasing the petitioner Juvenile on bail in Crime No.175 of 2021 pending on the file of Chandrayanagutta Police Station, Hyderabad in the event of his arrest as illegal and contrary to Section - 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short ‘JJ Act, 2015’).
2. Heard Mr. M.A. Mujeeb, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents - State.
3. The petitioner herein is sole accused in Crime No.175 of 2021. The offences alleged against him are under Section - 354 of IPC and Section - 7 read with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
4. As per the complaint, the allegations against the petitioner are that, on 10.04.2021 at around 8.15 p.m., when de facto complainant went out to purchase grocery, he entered into her house, started touching the private parts of her daughter and torn her kurti. The daughter of de facto complainant pushed the petitioner away in order to save herself, he beat her with fist blows. However, her daughter escaped from the petitioner and informed her over phone. When the de facto complainant came from the market, the petitioner along with his friends was standing outside her house and when she objected, he also started beating her with fist blows on her neck, head, chest and stomach and touched her inappropriately. Then, she cried for help, on which he threatened her with dire consequences.
5. On receipt of the said complaint dated 12.04.2021, P.S. Chandrayanagutta have registered a case in Crime No.175 of 2021 for the aforesaid offences.
6. The petitioner herein aged about 17 years claiming to be a juvenile, filed an application under Section - 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail before the learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad, and the same was returned with the following objections:
2) As per the citation filed along with this petition, observed that though there is no provision in CrPC, for grant of anticipatory bail, but even the High Court has powers to grant anticipatory bail in writ jurisdiction in appropriate Courts.
Returned,
Sd/ 7/5”
7. Referring to the said objections, Mr. M.A. Mujeeb, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that writ petition is maintainable as the JJ Act, 2015 is silent with regard to anticipatory bail. In support of his contention, he has placed reliance on the principle laid down in Kishan Kumar v. State of Haryana, CRR-725-2019 (O&M), decided on 08.01.2020.
8. On the other hand, Mr. S. Rama Mohan Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the present writ petition filed by the petitioner, a juvenile, seeking anticipatory bail is not maintainable. There is no provision in the JJ Act, 2015 to grant anticipatory bail to a juvenile. According to him, the provisions of JJ Act, 2015 are very liberal in granting regular bail to a juvenile and, therefore, the petitioner has to avail remedy under Section - 12 of the JJ Act, 2015. Instead of doing so, the petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking anticipatory bail and, therefore, the same is not maintainable.
9. In view of the above rival submissions, the question that falls for consideration before this Court is:
Whether a juvenile can seek anticipatory bail, that too by way of writ petition?
10. To decide the aforesaid issue, according to this Court, it is relevant to refer to the aims and objects of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, which is a Special Statute. Treatment of the child in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sen
The Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, consciously omitted to provide anticipatory bail for juveniles, considering the absence of the concept of 'custody' and the rehabilitatory, reformatory, and beneficial....
Petition under Section 438, Cr.P.C. is not maintainable in case of a juvenile.
The Act does not empower the police to arrest a child in conflict with law, and an application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. at the instance of a child in conflict with law i....
An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code at the instance of a minor/juvenile is not maintainable due to the comprehensive and distinct procedure laid down in the Juvenile Ju....
Liberty of a juvenile is the supreme factor, and he or she cannot be deprived of the liberty merely because there is no remedy seeking protection against his or her pre-arrest available under the Act
Anticipatory bail is available to children in conflict with law under Section 438 Cr.P.C., as the Juvenile Justice Act does not explicitly prohibit it, supporting personal liberty as per Article 21.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.