SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 240

B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Guntuka Sudharnani – Appellant
Versus
Gajji Suraiah – Respondent


ORDER :

This revision is filed challenging the order dated 27.10.2016 in I.A.No.262 of 2016 in O.S.No.1697 of 2012 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal whereunder an application filed seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit was dismissed.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.1697 of 2012, which is filed seeking relief of permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land described in the plaint schedule. An application in I.A.No.262 of 2016 was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XXIII Rule 1(3)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute a fresh suit in respect of the subject matter of the suit.

3. In the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.262 of 2016, the petitioner stated that she is the absolute owner and possessor of the plaint schedule property. Her husband passed away and she is one of the legal heirs along with her children. On a legal advice, she filed injunction simplicitor suit restraining the respondents from interfering with the plaint schedule property. The respondent/defendant No.1 filed a written statement in the suit a

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top