SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 115

A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
G. Vemanachary – Appellant
Versus
Putta Raghu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: R Prasad
For the Respondent: B Dananjaya

ORDER :

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders dated 02.12.2014 in I.A.No.240 of 2014 in O.S.No.173 of 2008 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gadwal.

2. This application in I.A.No.240 of 2014 was filed by the plaintiff under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the C.P.C.’) to mark the original agreement on his behalf. This application was allowed by order dated 02.12.2014. Assailing the same, the defendant filed this Civil Revision Petition.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of respondent. Perused the record.

4. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as plaintiff and defendant as arrayed in the original suit.

5. The plaintiff filed the original suit for mandatory injunction. Defendant filed the written statement. Issues were settled. In the course of trial, the plaintiff has filed this application in I.A.No.240 of 2014 to receive the agreement dated 30.4.2001, which is crucial document to establish his right of easement stating that except easementary right he is not claiming any other right in respect of immovable property. The said agreement dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top