SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 62

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Alluri Sowmya – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: S A V Ratnam
For the Respondent: Namavarapu Rajeshwar Raoassgi

ORDER :

Satish Chandra Sharma, J.

1. The present public interest litigation has been filed by the petitioner, who is claiming herself to be a young student, being aggrieved by the release of a movie in the name and style of “RRR”.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the movie has been produced by D.V.V. Entertainments and it relates to one Martyr Alluri Seeta Rama Raju and it projects that he was under the employment of the British Government as a Police Officer. He has been shown in the uniform of Police Officer. The petitioner’s contention is that the image of the freedom fighter is being tarnished by the moviemakers by projecting incorrect things about him and in those circumstances, the following prayer has been made by the petitioner :-

    “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue a suitable writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the picturisation of the life history of two legendary patriots, i.e., Martyrs Alluri Seetaram Raju and Komaram Bheem contrary to their lifestyle in the file “R.R.R. Roudram, Ranam and Rudhiram” as illegal and arbi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top