SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 77

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, JJ.
Bala Laxmi Rangu, TS., 4 Otrs. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of TS., Revenue, Hyderabad, 6 Otrs. – Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No.8 of 2017
Decided on : 01-04-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B. RACHNA

Limited scope of judicial review in policy decisions by the government, unless there is infringement of fundamental rights; Inapplicability of relief under Article 226 to enforce administrative rules without statutory force.

Headnote:

Creation of New Districts - Telangana Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Section 3 - [SOCIAL WORKERS] - [CREATION OF NEW DISTRICTS] - [Section 3 of the Telangana Districts (Formation) Act, 1974] - The court discussed the statutory provisions empowering the State Government to create new districts, revenue divisions, or mandals and emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in the absence of mala fides, extraneous consideration, or arbitrariness. The court cited the judgment in J.R.Raghupathy v. State of A.P. and highlighted the principle that relief under Article 226 of the Constitution is not available to enforce administrative rules, regulations, or instructions without statutory force, unless there is arbitrariness, absence of fair play, or discrimination. The court also referred to the judgment in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chaudhari Ran Beer Singh, emphasizing the limited scope of interference in policy decisions by the government.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, claiming to be social workers, filed a writ petition as Public Interest Litigation, challenging the creation of new districts in the State of Telangana, citing violation of the Telangana Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 and the Telangana Districts (Formation) Rules, 2016.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners failed to establish mala fides, extraneous consideration, or arbitrariness in the creation of new districts, and emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in the absence of fundamental rights infringement. The court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation, upholding the policy decision of the State Government.

Issues: Violation of statutory provisions in the creation of new districts, revenue divisions, or mandals; Scope of judicial review in policy decisions by the State Government.

Ratio Decidendi: Limited scope of judicial review in the absence of mala fides, extraneous consideration, or arbitrariness; Inapplicability of relief under Article 226 to enforce administrative rules without statutory force; Emphasis on the limited scope of interference in policy decisions by the government.

Final Decision: The Public Interest Litigation is dismissed, upholding the policy decision of the State Government in the creation of new districts.

ORDER :

Satish Chandra Sharma, J.

The petitioners claiming themselves to be social workers have filed this writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation being aggrieved by creation of new districts in the State of Telangana. The petitioner’s contention is that the formation of new districts is contrary to the statutory provisions as contained in the Telangana Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 and the Telangana Districts (Formation) Rules, 2016.

2. Section 3 of the Telangana Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 reads as under:-

“3. Division of State into districts, formation of new districts and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing districts:-

(1) The Government may, by notification, from time to time, for the purposes of revenue administration, divide the State into such districts with such limits as may be specified therein; and each district shall consist of such revenue divisions and each revenue division shall consist of such mandals and each mandal shall consist of such villages as the Government may, by notification from time to time, specify in this behalf.

(2) The Government may, in the interests of better administration and development of the areas, by notification, from time to time, and with effect on and from such date as may be specified therein:-

(a) form a new district, revenue division or mandal by separation of area from any district, revenue division, or mandal or by uniting two or more districts, revenue divisions or mandals or parts thereof or by uniting any area to a district, revenue division or mandal or part thereof;

(b) increase the area of any district, revenue division or mandal;

(c) diminish the area of any district, revenue division or mandal;

(d) alter the boundaries of any district, revenue division or mandal;

(e) alter the name of any district, revenue division or mandal;

(3) The areas, boundaries and names, of the districts, revenue divisions, taluks, firkas and villages in the State existing at the commencement of this Act shall be deemed to have been notified under sub-section (1) and shall continue until they are altered by the Government or the Commissioner of Land Revenue, as the case may be.

(4) The Commissioner of Land Revenue may, in the interests of better administration and development of the areas and subject to such rules as may be prescribed, by notification, group or amalgamate any two or more revenue villages or portions thereof so as to form a single new revenue village or divide any revenue village into two or more revenue villages, or increase or diminish the area of any revenue village, or alter the boundaries or name of any revenue village.

(5) Before issuing any notification under this section, the Government or the Commissioner of Land Revenue, as the case may be, shall publish in such manner as may be prescribed, the proposals inviting objections or suggestions thereon from the persons residing within the district, revenue division, mandal or village who are likely to be affected thereby within such period as may be specified therein, and shall take into consideration the objections or suggestions, if any, received.

(6) Any notification under this section may contain such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions (including provisions as to adaptation and construction of laws) as the Government or the Commissioner of Land Revenue, as the case may be, may deem necessary.

(7) Notwithstanding anything contained in subsection (5), Government may issue notification under subsection (1) to form a new District, Revenue Division, Mandal, Village in variance to the proposals notified under sub-section (5).”

3. The aforesaid statutory provision of law empowers the State Government to create new district, revenue division or mandal by uniting two or more districts, by increasing the area of any district, by diminishing the area of any district or even change the boundaries of the district, revenue division or mandal. The petitioners have prayed for quashment of G.O.Ms.No.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top