SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 109

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
INDERJEET SINGH, RAVI CHIRANIA
Sunil Jangid S/o Heeralal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : R.N. Mathur, R.D. Meena, Suresh Pareek, S.L. Sharma, Rahul Kamwar, Vaibhav Nirmal, Bharat Kumar, Shubham Rohila, Raghunandan Sharma, Abhinav Shrivastava, Ayush Bishnoi, Prem Chand Dewanda, Abhisehk Singh, Ajay Poonia, Vikas Meena Ravi Palsaniya, Shailesh Prakash Sharma, A.R. Meena, Lakhan Singh Tomar, Hari Kishan Saini, Sudarshan Laddha, Laxmi Kant Malpura, Vaibhav Nirmal, Lakshya Sharma, Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Balveer Singh Beniwal, Aradhana Swami, Khurshid Ahmed Khan, Pradeep Kalwania, Jai Raj Tantia, Dharmendra Sharma, Ved Prakash Saini, Asgar Khan, Satyapal Poshwal, Pradeep Singh, Anil Kumer Beri, Komal Dua, Piyush Sharma, Hari Kishan Saini, Sanjay Mehrish, Ram Pratap Saini, Mayank Kumar Choudhary, Amit Singh Shekhawat, Prashant Kumar Sharma, Himanshu Jain, Dharmendra Sharma, Anupam Sharma, Sumer Singh Ola, Prashant Kumar Sharma, Ankur Rastogi, Azad Ahmed, Hanuman Choudhary, Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, Anurag Shukla, Gajendra Vyas, Ravi Kumar Palsaniya, Bharat Yadav, Vinod Kumar Sharma, Yashodhar Pandey, Vivek Joshi, Atar Singh, Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi, Monika, Tanveer Ahamd, R.D. Meena, Sandeep Saxena, Aamir Khan
For the Respondents: Rajendra Prasad, Harhita Thakral, Dhriti Laddha, Tanmay Goyal, Kapil Prakash Mathur, Ashutosh, Prateek Saxena, Saurabh Sharma, Divya Rathore, Anshul, Anjali, Pranay, Sumit Purohit, Savita Nathawat

ORDER :

1. In the present batch of the petitions, since common questions are involved, therefore, at the request of counsel for the parties, these petitions have been heard together and are being decided by the present order.

2. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners challenging the notifications dated 20.11.2025 and 28.12.2025 issued by the respondents in relation to delimitation of various Gram Panchayats, Panchayat Samitis, and Zila Parishads; change of their headquarters; merger of one Gram Panchayat with another; inclusion or exclusion of villages from one Gram Panchayat to another.

3. The facts, as prayed, have been noticed from D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.988/2025. In the first round of litigation, several writ petitions (CWP-7781/2025-Sheela Kumari Vs. State of Raj. & Ors., & other petitions) were filed before this Court challenging the initiation of the process of delimitation of Gram Panchayats, Panchayat Samities and Zila Parishads by the State Government. The said writ petitions were decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.11.2025 directing the respondents to conclude the process of delimitation by 31.12.2025 with a further directio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top