IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Methuku Ventures Ltd. & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Hyderabad & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition Nos.24514, 24558, 21042 of 2021 Along With Writ Petition Nos.26069, 26074, 26077, 26094 and 26102 of 2021
Decided On : 01-02-2022
Telangana State Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act, 1999 - Sections 5,3, 7, 7(1) , 6(4) and 4(3) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 120 B, and 168 - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 51 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Cheaing and dishonesty - Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for time being in force - Auction of attached properties - Cheat innocent and gullible people by inducing them to deposit money - Allegations against Petitioners are that they had established a society and company under name and style “Sun Mutually Aided Thrift Credit Co-operative Society” and “Sun Pariwar Upadi Management Private Limited” and other sister concerns to cheat innocent and gullible people by inducing them to deposit money - Alleged scheme peddled by the Petitioners, depositors were asked to deposit will be paid to them every month till the completion of 25 months - During the 26th month the initial deposit would be returned to the depositor – Held, Petitioners was that the impugned order failed to mention the grounds to make the attachment absolute - Court after perusing the said impugned order found that the Special Court only recorded the contentions of the Petitioner and gave no reasons to make the attachment of properties absolute - It is trite law that every judicial order should be a speaking order and it shall contain reasons. The order should reflect the contentions of the parties involved and should provide the rationale behind the decision at which court arrived. The court should not merely record the contentions of the parties, but has to apply its mind to decide the merits of the contentions - Writ petitions are allowed
ORDER :
The present writ petitions are filed seeking to declare G.O. Rt. No. 484 dated 07.06.2019 issued by the Home Department, Government of Telangana, order dated 16.09.2019 passed in Crl. M.P. No. 3902 of 2019 in Cr. No. 521 of 2018 attaching the properties of the Petitioners; order dated 04.08.2021 passed in Crl. M.P. No. 282 of 2020 in Cr. No. 521 of 2018 allowing to conduct auction of attached properties as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 and principles of natural justice and to set aside the said orders and to release the attached properties of the Petitioners.
2. In W.P. Nos. 26069, 26074, 26077, 26094 and 26102 of 2021 an additional prayer was sought to suspend the e-auction supposed to be held on 25.10.2021.
3. Heard Mr. S. Ravi, learned senior counsel representing R.S. Associates, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P. Nos.24514, 21042 and 24558 of 2021, Mr. J.P. Srikanth, learned counsel representing Mr. N.Ramanadham, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P. Nos.26069, 26074, 26077, 26094 and 26102 of 2021, learned Government Pleader for Home, Mr. G. Kalyan Chakravarthy, learned Standing counsel for ICICI Bank in W.P.No.26069 of 2021 and Mr. Dishith Bhattacharjee, learned standing counsel for Canara Bank in W.P. No.26074 of 2021.
4. Facts of the Case
(i) All the Petitioners are arraigned as accused in Cr. No. 521 of 2018. The allegations against the Petitioners are that they had established a society and company under the name and style “Sun Mutually Aided Thrift Credit Co-operative Society” and “Sun Pariwar Upadi Management Private Limited” and other sister concerns to cheat innocent and gullible people by inducing them to deposit money. Under the alleged scheme peddled by the Petitioners, the depositors were asked to deposit Rs. 1,00,00/- after which Rs. 6000/- will be paid to them every month till the completion of 25 months. During the 26th month the initial deposit of Rs. 1,00,00/- would be returned to the depositor.
(ii) Believing the scheme to be genuine, people deposited money, but no money was paid. On enquiry the depositors found out that they were cheated. Various cases including Cr. No. 521 of 2018, Cr. No. 624 of 2018, Cr. No. 15 of 2019, Cr. No. 2019 and Cr. No. 100 of 2019 were filed against the accused. All the cases were clubbed and a single charge sheet was field on 12.10.2020 in Cr. No. 521 of 2018. All the accused were charged under Section 420, Section 120 B, Section 168 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 5 of the Telangana State Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act, 1999 (hereinafter ‘the Act, 1999’).
(iii) After completing the investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed charge sheet in Crime No.521 of 2018 and the same was taken on file vide C.C. No.1 of 2020.
(iv) During the pendency of the said C.C. the Home (Passports) Department, Government of Telangana issued a G.O. Rt. No. 484 dated 07.06.2019 under Section 3 & Section 5 of the Act, 1999 attaching the properties of ‘Sun Pariwar Group of Companies’ and properties of the Petitioners herein.
(v) In the said G.O. Rt. No. 484, details of the moveable and immovable properties of the Petitioners herein were mentioned for the purpose of attachment. The details of the Petitioners and their properties sought to be attached are stated in the table below.
| Writ Petition No. | Name of the Petitioner | Accused Number as per Charge Sheet and the Alleged Designation | Property Attached/Seized |
| W.P. No.21042 of 2021 | Dornala Premalatha | Accused No. 6 Member of Sun Mutually Aided Thrift Co-operative Society | Sy. No. 130 IMAGE & Plot No. 40/Part and 41 admeasuring 300 Sy.Yds. purchased vide Doc. No. 3525/18 dated 02.03.2018 at SRO Gajwel
Sy. No. 174, Plot No. 17 & 18 admeasuring 242 Sy. Yds. purchased vide Doc. No. 1889/2018 dated 17.02.2018 at SRO Gajwel
Sy. Nos. 455/E/1, |
Properties purchased with depositor funds are subject to attachment under the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors Act, regardless of subsequent transfers.
The attachment of properties under the OPID Act, validated by proper procedural compliance, emphasizes the necessity of safeguarding depositor interests despite ex parte proceedings not infringing up....
Properties purchased with funds linked to a defaulting financial establishment can be attached under the Act, regardless of the source of those funds.
The appeal was dismissed as the Designated Court's order for attachment of properties was found to comply with legal provisions without procedural violations, affirming the necessity of following sta....
The Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act allows for the attachment and sale of property to ensure repayment to depositors without requiring a prior conviction of the deposit takers.
The court established that a prior judicial attachment order supersedes subsequent government actions regarding property attachment under the relevant acts.
Point of law: action of interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner by erecting board in the petitioner’s land is arbitrary exercise of power and it violates the fundamen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.